A Date Idea Analyzed

I don’t do conventions very often, but I recently went to ConBust out in Northampton, MA, while visiting some friends.  While I was there, I had a guy propose something fascinating to me.  I can’t remember the guy’s name, so if he or one of his friends sees this, post your info in the comments. (Edit: it was a dude by name of Thom Howe.)

The guy Thom had an idea for a date.  He wanted to rent a cherry picker, drive it to her door, and pick her up in it.

Then, he’d drive to the beach, and get there at just the right time to watch the sun set.

Once the sun had set, he’d activate the cherry picker, they’d be lifted up above the beach …

… and they’d watch the sun set again.

Clearly, this is an excellent idea, and any girl would be lucky to see this guy Thom at her door.  But is it plausible?  How fast and how high does the cherry picker have to go?

I tried to work out the answer for him there at the table, but there was a line of people and there wasn’t time.  But when I got home, I remembered it again, and I’ve worked out the solution.

Here’s the situation:

By the time the earth has rotated through angle theta, the cherry picker will have to have climbed to height h.

After t seconds, theta in radians is:

The height of the lift above the center of the earth is:

So the height above the surface (sea level) is:

Substituting everything so far we get this expression for the height the lift needs to reach t seconds after sunset to stay even with the sun.

Now, an actual cherry picker has a maximum lift rate (I Googled some random cherry picker specs, and 0.3 m/s is a normal enough top lift rate.)  We’ll call that rate v, so the actual height of the lift will be this:

Substituting that in and solving for v, we get this:

(That’s arcsecant, not arcsecond). This equation tells us how fast the lift has to go to get from the ground to height h in time for the sunset1.

But we can also get the answer by just trying a few different heights.  We plug it in to Google Calculator2:

2*pi*6 meters/(day*arcsec(6 meters/(radius of earth)+1))

and find that h=6 meters gives about the right speed.  So, given a standard cherry picker, he’ll get his second sunset when they’re about six meters up, 20 seconds later.

You might notice that I’m ignoring the fact that he’s not starting at sea level — he’s a couple meters above it.  This is actually pretty significant, since the sunset line accelerates upward, and it brings down his second-sunset height quite a bit.  If he got a faster lift, or used an elevator, the correction would become less necessary.  Extra credit3 for anyone who wants to derive the expression for the height of the second sunset given the lift speed and height of first sunset. For now, I recommend he dig a hole in the sand and park the lift in it, so their eyes are about at sea level4.

1 Ideally, we’d solve for h, but it’s inside the arcsec and that looks like it’s probably hard. Do one of you wizards with Maple or Mathematica wanna find the result?

2 If you work in one of the physical sciences and don’t use Google Calculator for all your evaluatin’, you’re missing out.  I wish there were a command-line version so I could more easily look/scroll through my history.  I know Google Calculator is largely a frontend to the unix tool units, but it’s better than units and available everywhere.

3 Redeemable for regular credit, which is not redeemable for anything.

4 I suggest a day when there aren’t many waves.

487 replies on “A Date Idea Analyzed”

  1. Of course, the whole plan falls apart much earlier, at the point where our protagonist says “Hello, girl I’m probably meeting one-on-one for the first time, please get into my cherry picker”.

    Like

  2. Just to be clear: h is the hight above sea level at which you can currently see sunset at a time t after seeing sunset at sea level.

    Therefore, to see the second sunset at a time t, you must travel at least h in at most t, so your vertical velocity is v = h/t.

    You have the equation for h, h/t = v, ta da!

    v = (re/t)*(Sec[2*pi*t]-1)

    For small t (t<2000 seconds or so), this is well approximated as:

    v = 0.0169 * t

    so

    v*t = h = 0.0169 * t^2

    If you need the solution past t=2000seconds, your cherrypicker is moving up at more than 100km/h… I’ll take two.

    Like

  3. Adam Williamson says:
    our protagonist says “Hello, girl I’m probably meeting one-on-one for the first time, please get into my cherry picker”.

    Uh, no. This is definitely NOT first-date material. This is more like anniversary material. This is something special and romantic that you do with someone very special – not just the chick you’re trying to impress. Especially because, as you point out, it’s a BIG assumption that the girl will be willing to see where you’re going with this, if it’s a first date.

    Because really, it’s not a stunt you can pull twice. You want to make sure that the person you see two sunsets with is someone worth it.

    Like

  4. As Andy said a couple of pages before, the most important unconsidered thing is refraction, not only it makes the sun look massive, but it also makes it seem to be higher on the horizont that it actually is.
    Any way it’s funnier like that.
    xD

    Like

  5. Funny and supremely nerdish.
    Clearly the date will not happen, as the author will be lost in a campus library somewhere. Anyone who even showed up at her door in a cherry picker would already be the “hero” of the day.
    Nicely done.

    Like

  6. I like the idea of a trampoline 😀 !!!

    its very convenient and much more simpler…..
    you don’t have to do so much calculation and it give multiples time
    the same result.

    Like

  7. Fair warning: if this is the first date… you’re setting the bar *incredibly* high for the rest of your lives (or y’know… however long you keep her around). But, that’s a really great way to get a woman to be completely and utterly devoted to you… but the important question is now: How do you top that?

    Like

  8. wishes she was the girl on the date says:
    April 17, 2009 at 12:42 pm

    Fair warning: if this is the first date… you’re setting the bar *incredibly* high for the rest of your lives (or y’know… however long you keep her around). But, that’s a really great way to get a woman to be completely and utterly devoted to you… but the important question is now: How do you top that?

    simple…
    show her my dick

    Like

  9. OK, Padloc got it right…there is a place for Maths, BUT THIS IS NOT IT! Go to a tall building, run Up the stairs if you must..but don’t try to impress me with formulae on a first date! Padloc…you free Friday?

    Like

  10. Great idea. I’ve done this in Colorado many times before, but the fact that you nerdcore fanatics actually took the time to try and CALCULATE how to do it is just nuts. Basically, when you’re on a date, if you’re thinking about the physics of the planet or calculating how to see 2 sunsets in a single night, then your date is probably going VERY badly. If, however, you’ve already figured all this out BEFORE the date, and can sway the conversation away from your complete nerdiness, you may actually end up getting your size small penis dipped in the ocean of a luscious female.

    Just a suggestion.

    Like

  11. that would be terrible, though, if the guy showed up in a cherry picker and told her his idea, and the girl just said, “hey, isn’t that from xkcd?” this blag reaches a huge audience but hopefully it’s all guys.

    Like

  12. side note.

    the cherry picker shown is not available in a two person model.. you would need a unit like this one

    or

    This is the style he drew. also.. they do not make a model of this style that drives… or even a off-road model.

    anyway…

    Like

  13. On the contrary, if that happened to me (as a female) I would say “Hey, isn’t that from XKCD?!” and be really excited about it.

    Like

  14. I haven’t yet worked out the math, but I beleive there is also a correction for latitude that needs to be done. Unless you are at the beach on the equator – which would be a very good place for a date. I think the latitude correction would only effect the time available rather than the height required.

    Like

  15. I don’t think refraction will play a very big role in the decision as h is small enough that refraction would be so minusculely (that’s right, made up adjective) different that it would not be noticeable to the naked eye. Light is still refracted by the Earth’s atmosphere even at 6 meters above sea level. Heck it’s probably not even noticeable until you are above 100 meters (I don’t know what the actual height might be because that is based entirely upon perception).
    This is similar to the fact that the Earth is actually an ellipsoid (its bend being so little that it is unnoticeable).

    Like

  16. Wait. I’m probably wrong…maybe refraction would be noticeable. Anyone with a huge garage happen to own a cherry picker? And live by the ocean? And follow this blag? It would save us some theorizing.

    Like

  17. In the Badlands of South Dakota, my friend Mary and I saw three sunsets in one day. We watched the sun go over one rise, ran up to the top of it, watched it go over a second rise, ran to the top of it, and then watched it go down for a third time (when I took possibly the best picture that anyone has ever taken, of Mary, hands to the sky, between me and the setting sun).

    Like

  18. A few notes:

    a) dear thom: watch it with the intellectual theft, young man.

    b) …. but thank you for bringing this to randall’s attention, something I wouldn’t have gotten around to even if i had been back in northampton.

    c) so, um, that’s actually neither a cherry-picker nor a forklift. it’s a vertical lift. a forklift has two prongs and lifts pallets, and a cherry-picker is an articulated-boom lift that sits on the back of a truck.

    d) as i said to thom many years ago… i will never forgive myself for the one time i drove by a used-car place that was displaying a cherry-picker for sale, and didn’t buy it – the fact that i was 12 then notwithstanding.

    e) other advantages: when picking up said lady, extend the boom horizontally right up to her front door, and knock. no walking = fucking sweet. also, the bucket designed for a single person means she has no choice but to snuggle up. finally, driving a beast of a greasy, ugly, diesel truck makes you feel manly.

    Like

  19. I was flying to Chicago a few weeks back and was flying due northwest, I think. Out of my window I could see the sun setting over the cloud horizon, towards the front of the plane. It was very pretty. I might’ve been imagining it, but I kept thinking that the sunset was abnormally long (an hour or so) because we were flying west, chasing it around the earth. Is that possible?

    Like

  20. Good idea but only really plausible on the west coast. Otherwise if you show up for a date at 5 AM with a cherry picker, a young lady would not be as open to the idea to watching 2 sunrises.

    Like

  21. I go gliding, and one of our group once managed to see the sun set twice in a day by watching it on the ground, taking a winch launch, and watching it again.

    A winch launch can get you to 1,000ft in a matter of 10 seconds on some days, probably the fastest thing in the world that can get you to 1,000ft from a standing start. Even the space shuttle can only just manage that. In any case, it’s more than is required according to your calculations, although the airfield was at 220ft or so above sea level.

    Other things you can do while airborne include seeing the entire ring of a rainbow, no pesky horizon to get in the way!

    Like

  22. You have to be careful if it’s a hydraulic lift device.

    Otherwise you’ll get hydraulic leakage (after picking the couple up, it will slowly leak down). It depends on the hydraulics and the weight involved.

    Such a scenario, involving a hydraulic lift used for roof access, got a friend of mine stuck on a roof for hours.

    Like

  23. As I saw the first baloon I thought it was going to be a play on word on popping one’s cherry… Glad there is some romantic people left out there in the world!

    Like

  24. @Blake: Your friend was probably using the wrong piece of equipment, then. The only hydraulic equipment designed for providing access is an elevator; most of those aren’t even actually hydraulic anymore.

    Save yourself a lot of hassle; Get a ladder, a forklift, and another person for your roof work. Also, don’t do anything potentially dangerous (like working on a roof) alone; A lot of injuries that start minor (e.g. Heat exhaustion) can get worse if left untreated, especially when combined with heights.

    Like

  25. There’s nothing to prevent you writing a shell script that submits to google calculator and keeps a history file…


    SDF$ cat $HOME/bin/gcalc
    #!/bin/ksh

    history="$HOME/.gcalc"

    echo "$1" >> $history

    plus='%2B'
    divide='%2F'
    mod='%25'

    query=$( echo "$1" |sed "s/%/$mod/g" |sed "s/+/$plus/g" |sed "s///$divide/g" )

    wget -q --user-agent="" -O - "http://www.google.com/search?q=$query"
    | grep ''
    |sed 's/^.*
    .*.*(.*).*.*.*$/1/'
    SDF$ gcalc '25/(2-3.6)'
    25 / (2 - 3.6) = -15.62500
    SDF$

    etc.

    Like

  26. Sorry but your math is horribly flawed. Let us continue from:
    h = r*(sec(2pi*t/day)-1)
    to simplify it, w=2pi/day
    h = r*(sec(wt)-1)
    for small values of wt, sec(wt) = 1/(1-wt)
    h = r*(1/(1-wt)-1) = rwt/(1-wt) || *1/dt
    v = rw/(1-wt)?2

    For the time frame we are intrested in, the speed of the point where sun is observable is moving upwards at speed of 460m/s. Sorry guys, it would have been awfully romantic but with cherry picker (w/o rockets) it is not going to work.

    Like

  27. The sand, and hence the air just above it, is going to be hotter than the air 20ft up. The air will therefore be less dense at sand level, causing the light to refract upwards, causing the sun to disappear before it reaches the sand-level tangent. Going up 20ft may make the sun visible for this reason as well as the change in tangent.

    Like

  28. I worked out the following:
    When Y is the height in meters when you see the sun exactly at the horizon (let’s say the sun is a point),
    X is the time in seconds since Y was zero, you get the following:

    Y = (6371 / cos ( (1/240) * X ) – 6371 ) * 1000.

    When you are at 18 seconds, you need to be at six meters to see the sun exactly at the horizon. I think this resembles his calculations very closely 🙂 and also gives you a nice graph to plot 😉

    Like

  29. In my example I used 6371 as the earth’s radius, and calculated that each second the Earth turns 360/24/60/60 =1/240 degrees. The ” * 1000″ at the end is to convert the kilometers to meters. Forgot to tell all this.

    Like

  30. If you take a flight in the right direction at exactly the right time you can see the sun rise in the west. A much more expensive date.

    Like

  31. you make math so much more interesting for some reason. 😦 I fell asleep through algebra II at least 3 times a week.

    Like

  32. Some girls would slam the door in your face if you arrived in a cherry picker. I mean – if you bring heavy machinery to “pop her cherry”, you’re doing it wrong…

    Like

  33. Sounds like a lot of work just to get ~20secs extra sunset, at least half of which will be in either “pause” or “slo-mo reverse”. Still, if she doesn’t see it as insanely geeky (in a bad way), it might come across as endearingly romantic …. ally geeky.

    I never knew those things were able to drive themselves, at least not at more than sub-walking pace. I thought they had to be towed by truck/pickup/SUV, or on a flatbed.

    Owen: Every day on my drive to and from work, I pass a large industrial hire yard that has about 30-40 of these things in different sizes and colours, including several big enough to rise above the elevated bit of motorway I’m travelling on (which is higher than pretty much everything else except clocktowers). On days with low wind speeds they crank them all up to random heights with advertising placards attached. If you’re still serious and fancy a journey I can give you the address 😉

    Like

  34. derive the expression huh? To nonmathmatically derive for humour:- well it goes from “you’re so sweet” to “I’m going to love you forever”.

    Alternately, the height can be expressed in how many heartbeats at what rate of acceleration due to stimulation of the “awww” factor. If she’s not a geeky kind of girl that is probably a ho-hum 30 beats.

    But if she IS a geeky and romantic lover of “Princess Bride” kind of sweetheart then you just may find yourself making the second sunset at the 50 beat mark. Lucky you !

    Like

  35. Anyone knows how i can determine speed from the function i wrote? It must be possible, I just need to know what the f ‘ (x) is…

    Like

  36. @Mikko:

    There has to be somethign wrong with your math, because if the sun’s observable point is moving by 460 m/s vertically, matt’s story would be impossible. Perhaps it moves 460 m/s laterally, which still gives us an acceptable window.

    Also, the formula solved for h is simply:

    h = r[sec(2*pi*h/[v*day]) -1]

    Further, the life would actually have to go a bit higher in order to watch the full sunset again. But it all seems reasonable and quite a good idea to me.

    Like

  37. Doesn’t all this math assume that the sun is a single point? Moving up 6 meters just to watch the last tiny bit of the sun dip below the horizon is not exactly watching it set again.

    I believe the sun has an apparent size of half a degree, so get even half of it above the horizon it seems to me you would have to go up alot more than 6m…

    Like

  38. After reading the ideas, and the comments, I would suggest an alternate approach for about the same price and promising to be a lot more romantic.

    Rent a room – a meeting room facing west so she doesn’t get the wrong idea. On the 20th floor of a high rise with a roof top access.

    Watch the sunset out the window (don’t care about the waves or the closeness to the equator!

    Walk, don’t run, to the elevator to the roof and leisurely watch the sunset again!

    Like

Comments are closed.