Wikipedia: Blogs

Wikipedia’s entry on blogs, with everything that is not the word ‘blog’ (or a derivative thereof) removed:

Blog Blog blog Blog Blog blog Blog blog blogs blog blogs blogs blogs photoblog sketchblog blog blog blogging blogging blogs blog blogs blogging Blogging blogging blogging blog blog blog blog blog blog blog blogging bloggers blog blogging bloggers blog blog weblog blog weblogs blogs blogging Blogs blog blog blog weblog blog weblog blog blog blog weblog weblog blogging Blog blog blog blog blog blog Blogging blog weblog bloggers blogs blogging blogs blogging blogging blogging blogging blogs blogs bloggers blogs Blogging blogs bloggers blogs blogs bloggers Blogging blogs blog blogs blog bloggers blog Blogs warblogs Blogging bloggers Bloggers blogging blogging blog liveblogging blogs blog blogging blogging blogs blogging blog blogging bloggers blogs blogs blog bloggers Blogs Bloggers bloggers blogs bloggers bloggers blog blogs blogs blogs weblog bloggers Blog moblog moblog blogs blog sketchblog photoblog Blogs blog blog Blogs blog moblog blogs blogs blogs blogs blogs blogs blogs blog blogging blog Blogs blogs Blog blog blog blog blog blog Blogging blogs bloggers bloggers Blog MyBlog blogs Blog blogs blog blogs blog blog blog blog blogs blog blog blogs blog Blogs blog blog blogging bloggers bloggers blog blog blogs bloggers blogging bloggers Bloggers blogs blog weblog Blogs blogs blogging bloggers blogs Blog blog blogs blog Blogging blogging bloggers blogging blogging bloggers bloggers weblog weblog weblog bloggers bloggers bloggers blog blog blog bloggers blogs blog blog blog blog blog blog blogging blog blog blog blog blog blog blog bloggers blogging blog bloggers blog Blogging weblogs blog blog blog blog blog blog weblog blogging blog blog blog blog blog blog Blog Blog Blogs blog blog blog blog Edublog blogging Blog blog blogging blogs blog blog Sideblog Blogs Blogs Blog Blog blogs blog blog Weblogs blog blogs photoblog Photoblogs Blogging weblog blog NewsBlog blog blogging blogs blogs bloggers bloggers Blog Blog Blog blogging Blog blog Blog Blog blog Blogs blog blog bloggers Blog Blog blog blogging blogs bloggers Blog Blog Blogs Blogging Blog Blog Blog Blog Photoblog Sketchblog blog blog blogging Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blogging Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog blog Blog Blog blog blog Warblog Blog blog Blog Blog Moblog Sketchblog Photoblog Blog Moblog Blog blog blog blog blog blog blog blog Blog Blog Blog MyBlog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog blogs Blog Blog Blog Blog blogs Blog Blog blogs Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blogs blog blog blog Edublog blogging Blog blogging blog blog Sideblog Blog Blog Blog Blog blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog weblog Blog blog Blog Blog Blog Blog photoblogs Photoblog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog blogs Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog blogs Blog Blog Blog blog Blog Blog blog Blog blog Blog Blog Blog blog Blog Blog Blog Blog blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog blog blog blogging bloggers imblogging Blog Blogs Blogging Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Weblog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Weblog Blog Weblog Blog Blog Blog Weblog Weblog Blog Blog Weblog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Blog Moblog

174 replies on “Wikipedia: Blogs”

  1. @Cesium.

    Similarly, one could say:

    An XKCD reader Cesium was writing the phrase:

    “The owner of an inn was painting the name, “Horse and Wagon”, onto a sign. A traveler passing by stopped and said, “There’s too much space between horse and and and and and wagon.”

    onto the XKCD blag, when Nate stopped by to point out: There’s too much space between “horse” and “and”, and “and” and “and”, and “and” and “and”, and “and” and “and”, and “and” and “and”, and “and” and “wagon”.

    That’s 21. Can we do better? Yes.

    Because this process can be repeated arbitrarily many times, so (by simple recurrence relations) I think that it is safe to say that for any number x of the form x = (-1/3) + (4/3)(4^n) where n is a non-negative integer, there exists a grammatically correct sentence with x consecutive occurrences of the word “and”. (Here, the property of ‘consecutiveness’ is independent of punctuation.)

    Like

  2. xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd xkcd?

    Like

  3. The original article also contains phlog, while the above post does not.

    @LSK: I see I’m not the only Underworld fan here….

    Like

  4. I’m really hoping that you did this automagically, rather than by hand.

    Maybe something like
    s/(?:[^w]+(?:(?!blog)w)*b)+/ /ig

    (can anyone find a more elegant way to do this?)

    Like

  5. Nate: To make it semi-intelligible, there would also have to be arbitrarily many quotation marks.

    Like

  6. s = ”
    for word in article:
    if ‘blog’ in word:
    s += ‘ ‘+word

    It may be more lines than a regular expression, but at least you can tell what it’s doing by looking at it.

    Like

  7. Kudos to any one that reads through this whole thing, ’cause I sure didn’t.

    Like

  8. I note Conservapedia’s entry on blogs is rather pathetic, only containing the word “blog” once and “web log” (as two words) once. Maybe we should help them out? Maybe a section on blogs in the Bible?

    Like

  9. Blogs. Blogs. Blogs they are everywhere.
    Blogs. Blogs. Blogs croaking fill the air.
    Louder. Louder. Louder is their blasting blair
    and there’s no silence in the night.

    Blogs. Blogs croaks heard three miles away.
    5. 6. 7 on that day.
    Blogs. Blogs multipling more each day
    and there’s no silence in the night.

    Blogs. Blogs don’t try to seek them out.
    Blogs. Blogs froud hidding all about.
    Grab. Grab. Grab their throats and ring them out.
    cause there’s no silence in the night.

    Blogs. Blogs their good is only bad.
    Flirting. Flirting. Flirting on thier lilly pad.
    Mom. Mom. Mom says no but you know dad.
    and there’s no silence in the night.

    Blogs. Blogs don’t you know the strain?
    Blogs. Blogs. Please, please, please refrain
    and listen [croak, croak] there they go again. Blogs. Blogs
    and there’s no silence in the night.

    Like

  10. >What’ve you got?

    We’ve got:
    eggs and spam
    ham eggs and spam
    eggs bacon and spam
    spam eggs bacon and spam
    ham sausage bacon and spam
    spam spam eggs spam and sausage
    spam spam spam spam steak and eggs and spam
    spam-pancakes eggs spam spam and spam
    spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam and spam

    >Have you got anything without spam in it?

    What??????

    Like

  11. I think the wikipedia article is even funnier if you don’t remove some of the verbs:

    blog blogger blog blog is are blog blogs blog blogs, is blogs. blogs photoblog, blog, are micro-blogging blogging blogs blog blogging blogging are have blogging blog blogger, blog.citation blog blogging is bloggers, is blog blogging bloggers, blog have weblog is blog weblogs blogs is blogging. blog blog blogger weblog blog, weblog blog blog blog, weblog blogging blog blog blog blog blogger blogger.com blogrolls weblog bloggers blogs blogging blogs blogging blogging blogging has blogs have bloggers. blogs blogging blogs bloggers blogs blogs bloggers blogs blogged, blogs blog bloggers blog. warblogscitation bloggers blogging: blogging blog is blogs blog blogging blogging blogs blogging. blog blogging bloggers, blogs blogs. blog bloggers has is bloggers bloggers blogs bloggers bloggers have has blogs blogs blogs weblog bloggers bloggers are blogs, is blog is is is sketchblog is photoblog. are is blog, blog is blogs is blog is blogs blogs, blogs, blogs, blogs, blogs, blogs blog, is is is is blogging blog blogs, are blog are blog blogosphere, blogdigger, blog blogs bloggers bloggers, blog mybloglog. blogs have blogs are blogroll. blogs blog blogrolls, are blogrolls, are blogs blogs has blogosphere blogdex blogs blog is is are blog blog blogging are have bloggers are bloggers have is blog blog blogs bloggers, are blogging bloggers bloggers are blogs j-blog weblog have is blogs are bloggers have blogs, blog-based have blog-based has blogs. blogger blogging is bloggers is is blogging are have bloggers have are bloggers, are weblog is weblog weblog bloggers, bloggers is bloggers blog blog blogger bloggers blog has is blog. bloggers have blogger. blog blog blogging is is blog blogger blogged blog blog: is bloggers blogging. blog bloggers blog have blogger blog. is blogger blogger blogger blog. has is weblog blogging blogger, blog blog bloggers is blogger bloggers blog bloggers weblog blogging blog blog has blogs, blogger blog blogs… is photoblog. blogging weblog newsblog, blogger blogging blogs, blogs, bloggers, bloggers blogger blogger blogger blogging blog blogger blog blogger blogger blogs, blogger blog, bloggers blog blogs, blogs, blog!: is blog blog blog blogging, blogs, bloggers bloggers blogs blogging is is is.

    Like

  12. I added mushroom to the badger page, I tried to be as subtle as possible.

    Like

  13. Go to the Badgers article and look carefully at the first paragraph of the “Badgers and humans” section. Mushroom! 😀

    Like

  14. Re: Kurt McAllister – October 6th, 2007 at 3:32 pm
    How long did it take you to do this? Do you have some sort of program that removes specific words or something?

    STAND BACK! and read #208 on regex’s 😉

    Like

  15. Step back! I know regular expressions.

    Seems that you have looked for words with “blog” as substring, hence missing things like “vlog”, and of course “blag”.

    Like

  16. Not too long ago someone edited the Wiki page for Duck and replaced the whole page with ” quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack” etc. Interblags.

    Like

  17. Went for “mushroom” in the badger article again at 17:25 Pacific…wonder how long it’ll last.

    Like

  18. Ah, I’d like to add a ridiculous blog permutation: plog, or plogging. To blog, politically. Also slightly euphemistic. e.g. “why don’t you just go plog about it, then?”

    Net value added to universe: 0

    Like

  19. To be fair, that’s like saying “The following sentence has everything but the letter ‘a’ removed: a a aa a aa aa aa a.”

    Like

Comments are closed.